Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12282 (JHR)

SUKHRAM TOPNO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8977/2025 · 2025-09-26

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8977 of 2025 --------- Sukhram Topno, aged about 45 years, Son of Late Mathura Topno, Resident of Village-Bangda Tangar toli, P.O. & P.S.- Kamdara, Dist.- Gumla.. ..… Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party(s) --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Fahad Allam, APP --------- 2/Dated: 26th September, 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 64 of B.N.S. Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent person and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the charge has already been framed against the petitioner on 15.01.2025 and till date not a single witness has been examined and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. He lastly submits that the petitioner is 19.08.2024. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner couple with the fact that petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and charge has already been framed and till date no witness has been examined; I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Gumla, in connection with S.T. Case No. 04 of 2025 arising out of Kamdara P.S. Case No. 44 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. No. 594 of 2024. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) September 26, 2025 Amardeep/