HARI RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. FISHERIES LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/1408/2025 · 2025-02-14
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122814 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122814 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9823-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1408 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hari Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Fisheries Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kishor Singh,Premkant Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner wants a direction to be issued to respondent No.3 to allot the pond existing on the Gata in question in open auction proceedings in presence of the petitioner along with other applicants after cancelling the previous auction dated
18.10.2024. The advertisement for auction was issued on 23.09.2024. The auction was held on 18.10.2024. Three persons participated in the auction. As per Shri Saxena, learned Standing counsel the petitioner was absent. Lease has already been executed in favour of respondent No.5. In these circumstances, there is a disputed question of fact as to whether the petitioner was present in the auction or not. This cannot be seen under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may avail other remedies as prescribed under the law. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 14.2.2025 G. Singh/- Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench