SUMITRA @ SUMITRA RAWAT AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/494/2025 · 2025-02-12
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122781 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122781 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9125 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 494 of 2025 Appellant :- Sumitra @ Sumitra Rawat And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Gaurav Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate for State as well as perused the record. The present appeal has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings of Sessions Trial No.1386/2020 arising out of Case Crime No.0068 of 2020, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)da, dha of SC/ST Act, Police Station Indira Nagar, District Lucknow.
Learned counsel for the applicants, after arguing for some time, does not want to press this anticipatory bail application rather seeks liberty to file a regular bail application in view of law laid by Supreme Court in order dated 7.10.2021 passed in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another. In view of the above, present appeal is dismissed as not pressed. It is provided that in case a regular bail application has been filed by the applicants namely Sumitra @ Sumitra Rawat , Baijnath Yadav @ Bachan Yadav and Dinesh Yadav within twenty days' from today before the court below, the same be decided expeditiously in view of the law laid by by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
Order Date :- 12.2.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench