Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010100372024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1574/2024 ON THE DEATH OF PESA RANI RAVANI HER LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS STRUCK OFF 2: SRI KAMAL SWARGIARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARA PO SINGRA PS BOKO MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 3: SMTI MANIKA KACHARI SWARGIARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARA PO SINGRA PS BOKO MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 4: SMTI DIPIKA SWARGIARY BAISHYA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARA PO SINGRA PS BOKO MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 5: SMTI ABHASMITA SWARGIARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARA PO SINGRA PS BOKO MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 6: SRI PAPU SWARGIARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARA PO SINGRA PS BOKO MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 7: SRI BIKRAM SWARGIARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARA PO SINGRA PS BOKO MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSA VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF HANGSHA RABHA HIS LEGAL HEIRS PHAGUNI RABHA AND ORS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI, SUKUNIAPARA, PO SINGRA, PS BOKO, MOUZA LUKI, DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 2:SRI TRIDIP RABHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARA PO SINGRA PS BOKO, MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 3:SRI SANJIB RABHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARA, PO SINGRA PS BOKO, MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 4:SRI AMIYA RABHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHUPGURI SUKUNIAPARAl, PO SINGRA PS BOKO, MOUZA LUKI DIST KAMRUP ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M TALUKDAR, MR. P P DUTTA,MS. M TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : MR G SAIKIA (R1-R4), N. GUPTA (R1-R4) Page No.# 3/3 Linked Case : Review Pet./5623/2024 (Filling Number) ON THE DEATH OF PESA RANI RAVANI HER LEGAL HEIRS KAMAL SWARGIARY AND ORS VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF HANGSHA RABHA HIS LEGAL HEIRS PHAGUNI RABHA AND ORS ------------ Advocate for : MR. M TALUKDAR Advocate for : appearing for ON THE DEATH OF HANGSHA RABHA HIS LEGAL HEIRS PHAGUNI RABHA AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 20.08.2025 Heard Mr. M. Talukdar, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 73 days in filing the connected Review Petition. 3. I have found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. 4. At this stage, going for issue of notice to the respondents would be nothing but sheer waste of time. 5. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. 6. The connected Review Petition shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant