Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12276 (AP)

First K SESHAVALI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6319/2019 · 2025-08-12

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010144472019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6319/2019 Between: 1. FIRST K SESHAVALI, S/O. K.CHINNA SESHANNA, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 5-90A, KURNOOL PURAM VILLAGE, KODUMURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, GUNTUR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODUMURU POLICE STATIOIN, KODUMURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. MR FIFTH K SHAIKSHA VALI, S/O. K.CHINNA SESHANNA, MAJOR, R/O, KURNOOL PURAM VILLAGE, KODUMURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SMT K LAKSHMIDEVI, W/O. 5 K.SHAIKSHA VALI, MAJOR, RIO. KURNOOL PURAM VILLAGE, KODUMURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. MR CHANDRA, POLICE CONSTABLE, KODUMURU POLICE STATION, KODUMURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. MR HIRAVALI, HOME GUARD, KODUMURU POLICE STATION, KODUMURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not taking any action in pursuance to the complaint lodged by the petitioner with him on 1.04.2019 and the directions of the 2rd respondent on the complaint lodged with him on 2.4.2019 against the respondents 4 to 7 and not even registering an FIR or causing any enquiries in terms c. Judgment of the Honourable Apex Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari Vs. State of U.P, as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to take action on the aforesaid complaints lodged by the petitioner and to register FIR, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 & 3 to take action on the complaint submitted by the petitioner on 01.04.2019 and 02.04.2019 forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6319 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that on receipt of petitioner’s report through post on 08.05.2019, police registered a case in Crime No.76 of 2019 on the file of the Kodumur Police Station, Kurnool District for the offence under Sections 341, 355, 506 r/w 34 IPC against the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 7 herein & investigating into the same. 3. The present Writ Petition is filed alleging that the police are not registering a case basing on the petitioner’s report dated 08.05.2019. 4. Admittedly, as of today, basing on the petitioner’s report, the police have registered a case in Crime No.76 of 2019 on the file of the Kodumur Police Station, Kurnool District and hence, nothing remains in the present Writ Petition, for further adjudication. 4 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.08.2025 PSA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6319 of 2019 Date: 13.08.2025 PSA