SONU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/126/2025 · 2025-09-08
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122757 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122757 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 126 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Ashish Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant restricted his prayer for giving him an opportunity to file an application for bail.
3. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 8, 2025 S. Shivhare Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Sonu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench