Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9579 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1782 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deva Nand Srivastava And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhineet Jaiswal,Shreya Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition pertains to consideration of the case of the petitioners for promoiton on the post of Assistant Consolidation Officer. 3. It has been submitted stated that petitioners are fully eligible and entitled to be promoted on the said post. He further submits that their juniors have already been promoted but the case of the petitioners have not been considered for the promotion. 3. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 15.01.2025 to the respondent which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 15.01.2025 (Annexure No. 21) in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 15.01.2025 (Annexure No. 21) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 14.2.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench