Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12274 (AP)

Polimetla Rathnagiri Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/6347/2019 · 2025-09-14

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010144732019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6347/2019 Between: 1. POLIMETLA RATHNAGIRI RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT YEARS R/O. CHILUVURU VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA COMMISSIONERATE AT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GANNAVARAM POLICE STATION, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6347 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, A).To declaring the action of the respondents in not registering the complaint dated 28.4.2019 lodged by the petitioner before the 4th respondent as illegal, void, arbitrary and violating the provisions of the Cr.P.0 as well the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. B).Consequently, to direct the respondents to register the complaint dated 28.4.2019 lodged by the petitioner before the 4th respondent and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Rama Rao Kochiri, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 15.09.2025 Pmk 3 15 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:6347 OF 2019 Date: 15.09.2025 Pmk