RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 11 OTHERS
WRIC/1499/2025 · 2025-02-14
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122733 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122733 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9803-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1499 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Mishra,Manvendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner claims to have a decree in his possession passed under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 but says that possession has not been handed over to him. The Standing Counsel says that in the documents annexed with the writ petition, the petitioner has stated that possession has been handed over to him but thereafter, some dispute has arisen with private parties.
3. These are not matters to be seen under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. There are remedies prescribed for execution etc.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 14.2.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench