Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12271 (JHR)

CHITO DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4045/2025 · 2025-06-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:15275] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4045 of 2025 ------ Chito Das aged about 30 Year, son of Nakul Das @ Mahra, resident of village Gobarsala, Post Office & Police Station Sarath & District Deoghar, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate Mr. Manish Yadav, Advocate Mr. Satyanshu Shubham, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 12-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.27 of 2025 registered under Section 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D and 84C of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because one mobile phone and two SIM Cards were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-10 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that there is no money trail involved in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.02.2025 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II cum Special Judge, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.27 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/