SURENDRA SINGH YADAV ALIAS DR. SURENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. SECONDARY EDU. DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/1700/2025 · 2025-02-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122694 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122694 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8708 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1700 of 2025 Petitioner :- Surendra Singh Yadav Alias Dr. Surendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Avinash Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for the respondents.
2. It has been submitted that the petitioner is Head Master who has received 'National and State Awards to Teachers' and according to Government Order dated 29.03.2019 they are entitled to extension of five years' service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance of the order dated 29.03.2019 the petitioners were allowed to continue till 65 years but after superannuation they have not been given regular pension and other post retiral dues and accordingly District Inspector of Schools, Firozabad sent letters and recommendations to the opposite parties for granting retirement benefits counting entire period of service. Opposite party No.3 issued direction on 17.11.2021 to all Regional Joint Director, Pension to proceed and dispose of the pension matters of National and State Award winning teachers in accordance to which similar situated persons were provided their all retirement benefits but the petitioners have been discriminated against and they have not been granted the post retiral dues to which they are entitled.
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances of the petitioners shall be substantially redressed in case opposite party No.1 is directed to consider and decide their claim.
4. Learned Standing counsel does not object to the same.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to move fresh representation to opposite party No.1 within two weeks from today. In case, such a representation is made opposite party No.1 shall proceed to consider the same and decided within six weeks thereafter by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioner. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 11.2.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench