Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 122676 (ALL)

SAKRUNBANO v. THE COURT OF LEARNED ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)/JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR AND 9 OTHERS

A483/146/2025 · 2025-02-18

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10444 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 146 of 2025 Applicant :- Sakrunbano Opposite Party :- The Court Of Learned Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate Sultanpur And 9 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Surya Narayan Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. In view of the proposed order being passed, notices to respondent Nos.2 to 10 are dispensed with. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for expediting the disposal of Complaint Case No.UPST040012802021, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., P.S. Gosaiganj, District Sultanpur. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that more than four years have been passed however, the matter could not be concluded yet. The applicant is a lady and abundant by her husband therefore, the direction from this Court for expediting the disposal of the case is necessary. Perused the record. The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated 11.03.2022 in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan and others Vs. Pasumpon Muthuramalingam and another, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 30839/2021, has held that undue preference should not be given to the new trials while expediting the proceedings over the old trial. In view of aforesaid discussion so also considering the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan (supra), the petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench