DEVKI NANDAN BAJPAI @ NANDAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/1200/2025 · 2025-02-13
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9326-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1200 of 2025 Petitioner :- Devki Nandan Bajpai @ Nandan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Shukla,Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in court is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record.
3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 07.12.2024 bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.0326 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 75, 76, 78, 333, 115 (2), 351 (2), 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Aliganj, District Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in F.I.R. have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest them, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure.
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.
6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts.
7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). Order Date :- 13.2.2025/Pks ( Brij Raj Singh, J.) ( Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench