HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 3550/2025 1. Firzina Kouser, aged 20 years D/o Mohd Qasim R/o Village Sagra Tehsil Mankote District Poonch 2. Mohd Yaser Rashid, aged 22 years S/o Mohd Rashid R/o Village Sagra Tehsil Mankote District Poonch …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Murtaza Budhana, Advocate with Mr. Mehtab Gulzar, Advocate Vs 1. The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir Through commissioner/secretary to Home Department civil secretariat J&K Jammu 2. The Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Poonch 3. The Station House Officer (SHO), Mendhar 4. Mohd. Qasim S/o Ghulam Mohd 5. Mohd Naseem S/o Mohd Hamid 6. Mohd Farooq S/o Manda 7. Mohd Zakir S/o Mohd Sain All are residents of village Baladh Sagra Tehsil Mankote District Poonch 8. Mohd Ghani S/o Nazam Din R/o village Sagra Chowki Mankote District Poonch 9. Mohd Rafiq S/o Nazim Din Serial No. 168 2 WP(C) No. 3550/2025 R/o ward No.3 Sagra Balad District Poonch 10. Mohd Arif S/o Mohd Irshad R/o Sagra Baladh Mankote District Poonch 11. Mohd Nazir S/o Mendia R/o Sagra Baladh top Mankote district Poonch …..Respondent(s) Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (15.12.2025) 1. The petitioners, both being of the age of majority, have exercised their free will to enter into marital relationship and for that have earned displeasure of their respective families. 2. To lend confirmation to the fact of their marriage having been solemnized out of their free will and volition, the petitioners have put on record a notarized marriage agreement dated 07.12.2025. 3. Along with the writ petition, the petitioner no. 1’s 10th Class Marks card evidencing her date of birth is also annexed which confirms the fact that the petitioner No. 1 is and was major at the time of solemnizing marriage with the petitioner No. 2. 4. The petitioners are in hiding fearing about safety and security of their life and limb suffering wrong at the hands of 3 WP(C) No. 3550/2025 respondents No. 4 to 11 who are to be carrying hard feelings against the petitioners for their act of marrying each other. 5. Keeping in view the mandate and dictate of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as laid down in case of Lata Singh vs. State of UP and anr, 2006 (5) SCC 475 in terms whereof a direction has been set into effect for the Govt. Administration and Police Authorities throughout the Country to see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a girl or boy who is also major, then the marrying individuals are not to be harassed by any one nor to be subjected to threats or acts of violence, and in case any such threat or harassment is confronted to be inflicted on the individuals then the persons responsible for holding out such threats/harassments are to be taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the Police against such persons and further stern action to be taken as provided by law. 6. Article 144 of the Constitution of India mandates all Authorities, Civil and Judicial, in the territory of India to act in aid of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Bearing this constitutional sanction in perspective and the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court set into place, it is a matter of duty for the Police Officials as well as officials of the concerned Civil Administration, 4 WP(C) No. 3550/2025 irrespective of hierarchical position, to ensure that marrying individuals who are major and have chosen to become husband and wife out of their free will and volition are not to fear anybody causing any harm to their life and limb. 7. This petition at the threshold is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Poonch to ensure by issuing appropriate directions to the respondent No. 3-Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station, Mendhar that the petitioners, namely Firzina Kouser and Mohd. Yasar Rashid are not subjected to any harassment/intimidation/threats at the hands of the respondents No. 4 to 11 or any other person acting at the behest and/or on behalf of the respondents No. 4 to 11. Further more in case the Police Station Mendhar, Poonch or any other Police Station has registered any FIR at the instance of the respondents No. 4 to 11 against the petitioners or either of the two petitioners then also no arrest of the petitioners shall be carried out or facilitated by the Police Station Mendhar, Poonch. 8. Disposed of. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 15.12.2025 Sneha