Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12261 (GAU)

PRADIP KUMAR DAS v. JULIE SONOWAL AND 5 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/288/2019 · 2025-03-18

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010100122019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/288/2019 PRADIP KUMAR DAS S/O LATE SADANANDA DAS, VILL.- BILARTARIHATI, R.P. ROAD, P.S. AND P.O.- BARPETA, DIST.- BARPETA (ASSAM). VERSUS JULIE SONOWAL AND 5 ORS. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:SAURABH SENAPATI THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:MALLIKA MEDHI DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES (FW) ASSAM SWASTHYA BHAWAN HENGRABARI GUWAHATI. 4:MUNINDRA SHARMA THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BARPETA. 5:TIRTHA NATH SHARMA THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES BARPETA. 6:PREMOTESH SHARMA THE ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OFFICER (FW) Page No.# 2/3 BARPETA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A Y CHOUDHURY, MR. T A CHOUDHURY,MR. N H LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, MR. A PHUKAN,MR. B GOGOI,MR P NAYAK,MR. B GOGOI,MR. D SAIKIA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 19.03.2025 Heard Mr. AY Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Chaliha, learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the directions contained in the order dated 15.11.2018 passed in WP(C) No. 1526/2015 has already been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner does not wish to press this contempt petition any further. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties that the directions contained in the order dated 15.11.2018 passed in WP(C) No.1526/2015 has already been complied with, this Court considers it appropriate to close this contempt petition at this stage. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed as not pressed. Notice issued, if any, are recalled. Page No.# 3/3 Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, also stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant