COCP-1019 IN THE HI 113 Amandeep K Sonali Giri a CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW and others’ respondent N of the petitio date of recei 2. despite the not been dec initiated aga 19.11.2025 3. the order da and Speakin 1019-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o deep Kaur Versus Giri and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. HS Saini, Advocate for Mr. Abhishek K. Premi, Advoca Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 19.11.2025 (Annex CWP-34414-2025, titled as ‘Aman ’ whereby the writ petition was d dent No. 2 to treat the said writ petitio petitioner and decide the same within f receipt of certified copy of the said o It is submitted by learned co e the above clear direction, the repres en decided till date. Thus, it is prayed ed against the respondents for not 2025 (Annexure P-1). Per Contra, learned counsel for dated 19.11.2025 (Annexure P- peaking Order dated 26.02.2026 has ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1019-2026 Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA dvocate for the petitioner. AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Amandeep Kaur vs. State of Punjab was disposed of with a direction to petition as representation on behalf ithin a period of 01 month from the said order. ed counsel for the petitioner that representation of the petitioner has rayed that contempt proceedings be r not complying the order dated sel for the respondents submits that -1) stands duly complied with; 26 has been passed by respondent ging Writ n to half the that has s be ated that dent RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1019 No. 2 rejec nothing surv 4. Court is tak learned coun 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. Speaking O action still su 8. 9. 09.03.2026 rishu 1019-2026 -2- rejecting the claim of the petitione g survives in the present petition. Copy of Speaking Order dated is taken on record. A copy thereof d counsel for the petitioner. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. The petitioner would be at libe Order, in accordance with law, i still survives. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable titioner. It is thus, submitted that r dated 26.02.2026 handed over in thereof, has also been supplied to oted above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid , if so advised or any cause of any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No that r in d to are sed said e of RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.