CHANDRIKA PRASAD v. SHRI RAVINDRA KUMAR DIR. PENSION U.P. IFMTR LKO.
CAPL/385/2025 · 2025-02-12
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122567 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122567 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8965 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 385 of 2025 Applicant :- Chandrika Prasad Opposite Party :- Shri Ravindra Kumar Dir. Pension U.P. Ifmtr Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya) Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. The present contempt application has been preferred for the alleged non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 21.02.2024, passed by this Court in Writ A No. 1517 of 2022 (Chandrika Prasad versus State of U.P and others) against the respondent i.e. Shri Ravindra Kumar, Director, Pension, IFMTR Campus, U.P.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant is unable to show any document filed along with the present afÏdavit whether the certified copy/photocopy of the order dated 21.02.2024 was ever served upon the respondent, as without service, the contempt could only be made once the order passed by the court is served and the authority is not complying the same, which is not there in the present case as the copy of the judgment and order dated 21.02.2024 was never ever served upon the respondent.
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt application as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file the same after service upon the respondent.
4. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 12.2.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench