Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9378 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1851 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Ram Pyari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Shanker Pandey,Abhishek Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Shri Prem Shankar Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the husband of the petitioner namely, late Munna Lal was working on the post of Gram Panchayat Adhikari, Block Purwa, District Unnao and died in a road accident on 22.09.2004. After the death of her husband, the petitioner has been granted family pension. 3. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that her family pension has wrongly been fixed by the respondents without taking into account that the wrong pay revision of her husband was done on 05.08.2006 with effect from 01.03.2000 and accordingly, it is due to the said wrong pay fixation, the petitioner is getting lessor family pension. 4. It has further been submitted that in the Pension Payment Order, the respondents have not taken into account and even the pension revision, which has occurred in the meanwhile, the benefit of which to the petitioner was not granted despite repeated representations having been made to the respondent no. 3. 5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent no. 2 may be directed to considered and decide the representation dated 09.01.2025 within a stipulated period of time. 6. Learned Standing Counsel does not object the prayer made by the petitioner. 7. In light of the above, with the consent of the parties, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 - District Panchayat Raj Officer, District Unnao to consider and decide the representation dated 09.01.2025 moved by the petitioner in accordance with law within six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. In case after due consideration, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for the claim sought for, respondent no. 2 and 3 shall ensure the payment for the same within next weeks thereafter. 8. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this petition is disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench