Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8476 Court No. - 17 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 86 of 2025 Applicant :- Veer Vikram Singh Alias Gopal Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Kumar Yadav,Mamta Raj Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Shri Santosh Kumar Yadav, learned Advocate has put in appearance by way of filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 and gone through the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief:- "(अ) यह ककि ममानननीय न्यमायमालय, ममानननीय परनी्ቌण न्यमायमालय, शनीममान कविशशेष न्यमायमाधनीश एस०सनी०/एस०टनी० (पनी०ए०) एक्ट, ससुल्तमानपसुर मम कविचमारमाधनीन कविशशेष स्ቔ परनी्ቌण ससंख्यमा -76/2025, अपरमाध ससंख्यमा- 202/2024, अन्तररत धमारमा 115(2), 352, 351(2) बनी०एन०एस० वि धमारमा- 3 (1) (द) (घ), 3 (2) 5 ए अनसुससूकचत जमाकत एविसं अनसुससूकचत जनजमाकत (ननृशसंसतमा कनविमा० ) अधध०, थमानमा ससंगमामपसुर , धजलमा अमशेठनी किकी सम्पसूणर किमायरविमाहनी समझझौतशे किशे आधमार पर सममाप/खणणቄኌत किरनशे किकी किनृ पमा किरम। (ब) यह ककि ममानननीय न्यमायमालय, ममानननीय परनी्ቌण न्यमायमालय, शनीममान कविशशेष न्यमायमाधनीश एस०सनी०/एस०टनी० (पनी०ए०) एक्ट, ससुल्तमानपसुर मम कविचमारमाधनीन कविशशेष स्ቔ परनी्ቌण ससंख्यमा-76/2025, अपरमाध ससंख्यमा-202/2024, अन्तररत धमारमा 115(2), 352, 351(2) बनी०एन०एस० वि धमारमा-3 (1) (द) (घ), 3 (2) 5 ए अनसुससूकचत जमाकत एविसं अनसुससूकचत जनजमाकत (ननृशसंसतमा कनविमा०) अधध०, थमानमा ससंगमामपसुर, धजलमा अमशेठनी किकी किमायरविमाहनी दझौरमान लणम्बत पमाथरनमा -प्ቔ स्थकरत किरनशे किकी किनृ पमा किरम।" Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No.4 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings i.e. Session Trial No.76/2025, arising out of Case Crime No.202/2024, under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) BNS & Section 3(1)(Da) (Dha), 3(2) 5A SC/ST Act, police Station Sangrampur, District - Amethi, pending before the Court of Special Judge SC/ST (PA) Act, Sultanpur, shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned Court within four week's from today. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within four week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise to the Counsel for the applicant, after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 10.2.2025/S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench