Sl.No. 5 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 27.03.2025 WPA 4287 of 2022 Jatan Pramanik -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Anandamoni Ghosh … for the State-respondent(s) None appears either for the petitioner or for the State, when the matter is called. Since none appears for the State, Ms. Anandamoni Ghosh, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State, is directed to represent the State. Her appearance may be regularized by the concerned authorities. The records of the writ petition speak that last of the representations was made on or about 30th May, 2021, thereafter, no complaint and/or information was furnished with the police authorities as is reflected in the enclosure of the writ petition. If the petitioner is faced with the same inconveniences, he is directed to approach the Inspector-in-charge/Officer-in- charge of Mandir Bazar Police Station, who would assess the inconveniences under the relevant provisions of law and take steps accordingly. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 4287 of 2022 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)