CRM-M-52296 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 304 AZAD SINGH STATE OF CORAM: Present: AMAN CHAUDHARY 1. Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 concession of anticipatory bail in case of FIR No. registered under Sections and 117(2) Arms Act, 1959 2. 52296-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AZAD SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG Haryana ------ AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 concession of anticipatory bail in case of FIR No. registered under Sections 190, 191(3), 115, 351(2), 324(2), 287, 126(2) 238 nd 117(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Bichhor, District On 17.09.2025, this Court had passed the following order: “ Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been attributed simple injury and that too not aimed at one who received it. It is a case of version and cross where the complainant herein has been, vide FIR No.124 dated 01.08.2015, Annexure P grievous injury to one Meera, reference is m MLR, Annexure P-6. Co enlarged on bail, vide order dated 22.08.2025, Annexure P-8. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case on account of party faction in the villlage IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52296-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.10.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondent AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG Haryana. been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking the concession of anticipatory bail in case of FIR No. 0117, dated 16.07.2025, 190, 191(3), 115, 351(2), 324(2), 287, 126(2) 238 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25 of the District Nuh. this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been attributed simple injury and that too not aimed at one who received it. It is a case of version and cross-version where the complainant herein has been, vide FIR No.124 dated 01.08.2015, Annexure P-2, attributed grievous injury to one Meera, reference is made to the 6. Co-accused, Rahul has since been enlarged on bail, vide order dated 22.08.2025, Annexure 8. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case on account of party faction in the villlage. been filed by the petitioner under seeking the .2025, 190, 191(3), 115, 351(2), 324(2), 287, 126(2) 238 25 of the Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been attributed simple injury and that too not aimed at one version where the complainant herein has been, vide FIR 2, attributed ade to the accused, Rahul has since been enlarged on bail, vide order dated 22.08.2025, Annexure 8. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the . HIMANSHU 2025.10.29 19:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-52296 3. mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner make himself available without demur. 4. joining the investigation by the petitioner investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner required for further custodial interrogation. 5. the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 52296-2025 (O&M) 2 He is ready and willing when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent Ms. Rosi, Advocate, appears and files her power of attorney on behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before his arrest, he shall be releas satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 28.10.2025. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner make himself available without demur. Learned State counsel on instructions joining the investigation by the petitioner investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner required for further custodial interrogation. In view of the above and without ex merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 17.09.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified on 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Ms. Rosi, Advocate, appears and files her power of attorney on behalf of the complainant, which is taken on Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 29.09.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 28.10.2025.” Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall Learned State counsel on instructions affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will B.S. Saroha, DAG, State. Ms. Rosi, Advocate, appears and files her power of attorney on behalf of the complainant, which is taken on Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the .09.2025. In the event of ed on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this - investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in to appear, he shall affirms the factum of and cooperating with the is not pressing any opinion on merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified HIMANSHU 2025.10.29 19:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-52296 6. cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory 28.10.2025 himanshu 52296-2025 (O&M) 3 However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. (AMAN CHAUDHARY Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present HIMANSHU 2025.10.29 19:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document