Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 122490 (ALL)

SOHANALAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/1222/2025 · 2025-02-12

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8968-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1222 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sohanalal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pathak,Brij Raj Singh,Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Considering the order proposed to be passed issuance of private opposite parties is dispensed with. 3. The petitioner alleges interference by the private opposite parties and violation of a temporary injunction granted by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Shrawasti in Regular Suit No. 90 of 2018; Sohan Lal Vs. Khema and Ors. 4. If the private opposite parties are denfendants in the aforesaid Suit and the said temporary injunction dated 25.04.2019 is still operating, then, District/ Police authorities are obliged to ensure its compliance and prevent its violation as far as it may be permissible without prejudice to the rights of the private opposite parties in the pending suit. 5. If the petitioner is still aggrieved he can approach the Court below by moving appropriate application. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 7. Shri Nishant Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel shall communicate this order to the official opposite parties for compliance. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 12.2.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench