SHASHI MOHAN SHARMA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/1603/2025 · 2025-09-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122441 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122441 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1603 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:
"(i). To issue Writ, order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding Respondent No. 3 to consider the case of Petitioners for promotion on the post of Assistant Consolidation Officer (A.C.O), within reasonable time fram as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper."
3. Since consideration of petitioners grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to submit their fresh individual representation before the opposite party no. 3-Consolidation Commissioner, U.P. Lucknow or any other competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same expeditiously within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order is served to opposite party no. 3.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, petition stands disposed of. September 17, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhineet Jaiswal, Shreya Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shashi Mohan Sharma And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench