Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12243 (JHR)

ARUN HAJAM ALIAS ARUN HAZAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3638/2025 · 2025-05-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:13899] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3638 of 2025 ------ Arun Hajam @ Arun Hazam, aged about 28 years, S/o- Madan Hajam @ Madan Hazam, R/o-village- Jareya, P.O.- Jareya, P.S.- Namkum, District- Ranchi .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.194 of 2024 (N) corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.72 of 2024 (S) registered under Section 17 B, 22, 25, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was dealing with opium and from the brother of the petitioner namely Shivam Kumar Hajam, only 500 gm of opium was seized which comes under intermediary quantity. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.09.2024 passed in B.A. No.5986 of 2024. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.03.2025 as is evident from para-17 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner-cum-Sessions Judge (N.D.P.S.), Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.194 of 2024 (N) corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.72 of 2024 (S) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/