NEERAJ KUMAR v. SHRI VISHAL KUMAR YADAV, SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, RAEBARELI
CAPL/361/2025 · 2025-05-01
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 361 of 2025 Applicant :- Neeraj Kumar Opposite Party :- Shri Vishal Kumar Yadav, Special Land Acquisition Officer, Raebareli Counsel for Applicant :- Dilip Kumar Singh Chauhan Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard Shri Dilip Kumar Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Amrendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party.
2. The present application has been filed with the prayer to summon and punish the opposite party for wilful and deliberate defiance of the order dated 15.07.2024 passed by the Writ Court in Writ C No.5831/2024.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the grievance of the applicant was not being considered by the opposite party, therefore, he filed Writ C No.5831/2024 which was disposed of on 15.07.2024 with liberty to the applicant to move application before the SLAO, Raebareli. Thereafter, the applicant moved an application before the Authority concerned but the same was not being decided. As a result, the present contempt application has been filed. He further submits that the affidavit of of compliance has been filed twice by the opposite party but order of Writ Court has not been complied with till today.
4. Shri Amrendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel draws attention of this Court on the affidavit of compliance dated 25.03.2025 and submits that the order of Writ Court has already been complied with by deciding the representation of the applicant vide order dated 12.03.2025 with the observation that the compensation in relation to the property in question has already been given in the year of 1988. Therefore, the present contempt application may be dismissed.
5. Considering the submission of counsel for the parties, going through the contents of application as well as other relevant documents, it is evident that representation of the applicant has already been decided vide order dated 12.03.2025, therefore, no contempt is made out against the opposite party.
6. Accordingly, the present contempt application is hereby dismissed.
7. However, it is open to the applicant to seek appropriate remedy, if he is having any grievance. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 V. Sinha Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench