Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12242 (AP)

PULLAGURA NAGESWARA RAO v. PULLAGURA RAJESH

CRP/1313/2018 · 2025-07-01

Nyapathy Vijay

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

i APHC010143322018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1313 OF 7MR Petition fiied under Article 227 of the Constitution the circumstances stated i pleased to set aside the Order 2017 in O.S.No.167 of 2013, Krishna District. Between; of India, praying that in in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be dated 28.12.2017 passed in I.A.No.356 of on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nandigama, Pullagura Nageswara Rao, S/o.Late Agricuiture. R/o.Mylavaram Viliage and Mandai, Krishna District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.1/1^* Defendant AND 1. Pullagura Rajesh, S/o.Late Venkata Rama OcciCultivation, R/o.Kanchikacherla District. 2. Satyavolu Jyothirmayi @ Jyothi, W/o.Hussain R/o. Hyderabad. (2nd respondent is not necessary party) Appaiah, aged:Major, Occ: Rao, aged about 32 years Village and Mandai, Krishna Sha Kiran, aged.Major, ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty The Court made the following: APHC010143322018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1313 OF 2018 Between; 1. PULLAGURA NAGESWARA RAO, S/o. Late Appaiah, aged . Major, Occ. Agriculture R/o.Mylavaram Village and Mandal, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND I 1. PULLAGURA RAJESH, S/o. Late Venkata Rama Rao, Aged about 32 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o Kanchkacherla Village and Mandal, Krishna District. 2. Satyavolu Jyothirmayi and C Jyothi, W/o Hussain Sha Kiran, aged Major, R/o Hyderabad. (2nd respondent is not necessary party) ...Respondent(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1313 of 2018 ORDER: 1. The present C.RP is filed questioning the Order dated 28.12.2017 passed in I.A.No.356 of 2017 in O.S.No.167 of 2013 by the Senior Civil Judge, Nandigama, Krishna District. 2. As per the case status available in e-Courts (CIS), the suit O.S.No.167 of 2013 was dismissed on 31.12.2024. In that view, no orders are required to be passed in this Revision. 3. Therefore, the C.R.P is dismissed, as infructuous. 4. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. \ Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 7k> //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER | To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nandigama. Krishna District. 2. One CC to Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies BSV nm HIGH COURT DATED:02/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 1313 OF 2018 dismissing the civil revision petition AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS