SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. CIVIL SECRETARIAT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/1145/2025 · 2025-02-17
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122407 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122407 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10053-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1145 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secretariat Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Gopal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit, filed by learned counsel for the petitioner, is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
3. The petitioner has approached this Court for the following main prayer:
"issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party nos. 1 to 3 decide early the petitioner application dated 01.02.2025 and dated 03.02.2025 to send through registered post of competent authorities for Please refer the applicant's vehicle Scorpio (UP 32 PV 0055) and after conducting a fair inquiry, if found guilty, take legal punitive action against the employees and restrain the opposite party no. 3 to 5 from harassing, threatening and illegally interfering in peaceful life of the petitioner and petitioner's family in the interest of justice."
4. Learned A.G.A, on instructions, states that 'challan' of the vehicle has already been forwarded to the Court and a copy of the 'challan' is also provided to learned counsel for the petitioner today in Court.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to move appropriate application before the court concerned for release of the vehicle.
6. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is consigned to record as withdrawn.
7. It is clarified that if an appropriate application is moved by the petitioner before the court concerned, the Court shall consider and decide the same, expeditiously. (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 17.2.2025/Praveen Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench