Aheibam Sarju Devi v. Namoijam Kheda Varta Singh And 3 Ors
CONT CAS(C)/65/2024 · 2025-04-03
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1224 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1224 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
P a g e | 1
Item No. 39
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Cont. Cas(C) No. 65 of 2024 Ref:- WP(C) No. 141 of 2022
Aheibam Sarju Devi …Petitioner - Versus - Namoijam Kheda Varta Singh and 3 Others …Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR
O R D E R 03.04.2025
[1]
Mr. B. Kirankumar Sharma, learned counsel, appears for the petitioner; Mr. Irom Denning, learned counsel, appears for respondents No. 1, 2 & 4 and Mr. Albert Keisham, learned counsel, appears for respondent No. 3. [2]
The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has placed the proceeding dated 1st April, 2025 being No. 41/1/CAF&PD/2023/DC (JBM)s issued by the Deputy Commissioner/DM, Jiribam before this Court today informing that a sum of Rs. 1,67,95,031/- (Rupees one crore sixty- seven lakh ninety-five thousand and thirty-one only) has been sanctioned and transferred to the A/C No. 20167064613, IFSC-SBIN0016013, State Bank of India, High Court Complex, Chingmeirong in the name of Aheibam Sarju Devi. A cheque showing the actual payment of Rs. 1,67,95,031/- (Rupees one crore sixty-seven lakh ninety-five thousand and thirty-one only) to the Manager, Bandhan Bank Ltd., for RTGS/NEFT dated 19th March, SHAMURAI LATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Date: 2025.04.04 15:34:38 +05'30'
P a g e | 2
2025 signed by the Deputy Commissioner, Jiribam District, Manipur is also enclosed along with the proceedings dated 1st April, 2025 of the Deputy Commissioner/DM, Jiribam. The receipt discloses that the petitioner has received the amount of Rs. 1,67,95,031/- (Rupees one crore sixty-seven lakh ninety-five thousand and thirty-one only). [3]
In view of the above, the order of the Court is complied with and the contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil