Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12239 (UTT)

ISLAMUDDIN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2293/2021 · 2025-08-04

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2293 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel supplied instructions dated 23.07.2025 to the Court, which are taken on record. On instructions, he submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 06.02.2022. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would advice his client to challenge the charge- sheet in appropriate proceedings. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed as such. 6. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet, if so advised, in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 04.08.2025 AK