[2025:RJ-JP:5357-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 285/2024 Maliram S/o Shri Narayan Singh Bijarniya, Aged About 84 Years, R/o Village And Post Baggar, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Pawan Kumar Goyal, Principal Secretary To Government, Department Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur-302005(Raj.). 2. Shri Ashish Modi Ias, Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Bikaner, (Raj.). 3. Shri Manoj Kumar Dhaka, District Education Officer, Secondary Education Department, Jhunjhunu, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 4. Shri Pramod Gangwar, Secretary Managing Committee, B.l. Education Trust 507 Raheja Center, 215 Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 (Maharashtra). 5. Shri Pramod Gangwar, Secretary Managing Committee, B.l. Senior Secondary School Baggar, Opposite Apex Tower, B.l. Chowk, Baggar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 6. State Of Rajasthan, Through Education Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. Secretariate, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Hardik Singh HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 06/02/2025 1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by this Court on 06.11.2015. 2. The order passed by this Court was a judgment in rem. 3. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner. Instead of issuing notice on contempt, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction that the case of the petitioner shall also be examined in terms of an order dated 01.12.2021 passed [2025:RJ-JP:5357-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-285/2024] by this Court in the case of Shri Banwari Lal Bhukar & Anr. vs. Anoop Khinchi & Ors.-D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.740/2016 and other connected matters wherein this Court had given detailed directions as below:- “1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the directions which have already been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Manju Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.13791/2019, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within a period of eight weeks. 2. 2. A brief, but clear order regarding compliance of the order in respect of each of the contempt petitioners will have to be passed by the concerned Directorate within a period of ten weeks from today. 3. The orders in respect of each of the contempt petitioners, which are required to be passed clearly stating compliance of the order, shall be reported directly to the Registry of this Court, which shall be placed before this Court under a separate registered case. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition, at this stage, is disposed off, however, with liberty to revive, if any grievance still remains unredressed.” 4. All the authorities including the Secretariat of the Department of College Education as also the private school education officials shall be under an obligation to provide necessary information, if any demanded by Commissionerate of College Education, towards compliance of the order which was passed earlier by this Court and in the case referred to hereinabove. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi/Gaurav/32