Tukaram Ram Ippar and anr v. Ram Mahadu Ippar and ors
CA/4279/2025 · 2025-08-08
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12235 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12235 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 953 ca4279.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4279 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 8105 OF 2025 Tukaram Ram Ippar and another .. Applicants Versus Ram Mahadu Ippar and others .. Respondents Shri Shrikant B. Madde, Advocate for the Applicants. The Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 are served.
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 08TH AUGUST, 2025.
FINAL ORDER : . Heard Mr. Madde, learned counsel for the applicants. None appears for the respondents.
2. Applicants seek to condone delay of 160 days caused in filing second appeal. The contents of the application have not been controverted by the respondents. There are no malafides on the part of the applicants to file the appeal belatedly. The civil application is allowed. The delay stands condoned. Office is
directed to register second appeal. The civil application is
disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Aug. 25 2025:BHC-AUG:21319