Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12232 (GAU)

THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS v. BABY RABHA (BABY RAVA)

I.A.(Civil)/1551/2025 · 2025-07-15

Acting, N Unni Krishnan Nair

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010100492025 2025:GAU-AS:9169 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1551/2025 THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAWAN, NEW DELHI, PIN- 110001 2: THE GENERAL MANAGER (CONSTRUCTION) NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI PIN- 781011 ASSAM. 3: THE GENERAL MANAGER NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM 781011 4: THE CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI PIN- 781011 ASSAM 5: THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL ADVISER CUM THE FINANCIAL ADVISER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI PIN- 781011 ASSAM 6: THE FINANCIAL ADVISER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER CONSTRUCTION NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON Page No.# 2/4 GUWAHATI ASSAM 781011 7: THE DEPUTY FINANCIAL ADVISER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER CONSTRUCTION I NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM 781011 8: THE SENIOR ASSISTANT FINANCIAL ADVISER PENSION NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI PIN- 781011 ASSAM. 9: THE SENIOR ASSISTANT FINANCIAL ADVISER CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION NORTH EAST RAILWAY FRONTIER MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM 78101 VERSUS BABY RABHA (BABY RAVA) W/O- SHRI BIKRAM RAVA, EX-ACCOUNTS ASSISTANT (ACCOUNTS,CONSTRUCTION), N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781011, R/O HOUSE NO. 78, LUTUMA KAHILIPARA, P.O. BINOVA NAGAR, P.S. FATASIL AMBARI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781018 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B SARMA, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N G KUNDU, MR. S NATH Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) MR. LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR O R D E R 16.07.2025 (L.S. Jamir, C.J.(Acting)) Heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned CGC, for the applicants. Also heard Mr. S. Nath, learned counsel, for the opposite party No. 1/writ petitioner. 2. WP(C) No. 6504/2023 was disposed of on 25.02.2025 with the following directions: “5. In such circumstances, we dispose of this writ petition with the direction to the respondents to take a decision on the question of pension entitlement of the petitioner while taking into consideration Rule 9(1) of the 1993 Rules within a period of 2 (two) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 6. With the above observations and direction, this writ petition is disposed of.” 3. By way of the present application, the applicants are praying for extension of time for 6 (six) months to carry out the directions passed by this Court which is reproduced hereinabove. 4. After hearing the parties, we find it appropriate that 2 (two) months further extension of time from today would suffice to carry out the directions passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, 2 (two) months time is allowed to the applicants for Page No.# 4/4 compliance of the directions passed by this Court on 25.02.2025 in WP(C)/6504/2023. 6. We also make it clear that there shall be no further extension on any grounds. 7. I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) Comparing Assistant