Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12231 (JHR)

PAPPU YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3872/2025 · 2025-06-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:15088] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3872 of 2025 ------ Pappu Yadav, aged about 21 years, son of Surendra Yadav, Resident of Durlapur, P.O.- Samri, P.S.- Samari, District- Balia, State- Uttar Pradesh. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-11-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.94 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 12 of Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Section 47, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56(c) of Transport of Animals Rules, 1978. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, being the driver of the vehicle, was involved in transportation of bovine animals for their slaughter illegally. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this court towards para-9 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.02.2025 as is evident from para-10 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.94 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/