Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12230 (AP)

DUNNA SRINIVASA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/7376/2025 · 2025-03-21

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7376 OF 2025 Between: 1. Dunna Smivasa Rao, S/o. Paparao, Aged about 54 years working as Cleaner, O/o. DM and HO, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 2. Rambilli Ramakrishna, S/o. Appala Naidu (Late), Aged about 58 working as MNO, PHC, Srikurmam, Srikakulam District. (Late), Aged about 57 years working as MNO, PHC, Caiingapatnam, Srikakulam District. years ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Deputy Director, District Treasury Office, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 3. The District Medical and Health Officer, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 4. The Medical Officer, PHC, Caiingapatnam, Srikakulam District. 5. The Medical Officer, PHC, Srikurmam, Srikakulam District. 6. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Nidhi Bavan, A P Mangalagiri, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not considering the representation dated 20.09.2024 of the petitioners to the 2'""' respondent are as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of may 47 provisions of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to consider/dispose of the representation dated 20.09.2024 of the petitioners to the 2^^ respondent forthwith. t lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider/dispose of the representation dated 20.09.2024 of the petitioners to the 2^^^ respondent forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI BALA RAMESH YALAVARTHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : ASST.GOVT. PLEADER FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010144132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATJ (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7376/2025 Between: Dunna Srinivasa Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BALA RAMESH YALAVARTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I 2 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s;- “...to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not considering the representation dated 20.09.2024 of the petitioners to the 2'"'' respondent are as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of provisions of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to consider/dispose of the representation dated 20.09.2024 of the petitioners to the 2"'* respondent forthwith and pass such other order or orders....” Heard Sri Bala Ramesh Yalavarthi, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I 2. for respondents. The services of the petitioners have been regularized vide 3. Rc.No.688/E8/2024, dated 07.06.2024. However, they are not being paid periodical increments and other benefits. For which, they have also submitted representation on 20.09.2024 to the 2^'^ respondent, which is pending consideration. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits it would suffice to direct 2^"^ respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioners’ representation dated 20.09.2024. 4. 3 Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents submits that the representation made by the petitioners 5. will be considered in accordance with law. In view of the said submissions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 2"'^ respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on petitioners’ representation dated 20.09.2024, 6. in accordance with law, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V.SAVITHRI GOWRI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, OFFICER SE' ?[? Secretary, Finance Department A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur^District. Director, District Treasury Office 3. The District Medical and Heaith Officer, 4. The Medical Officer, PHC, Calingapatnam 5. The Medical Officer, PHC, ‘ Treasuries and Accounts Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 7. One CC to Sri Bala Ramesh Yalavarthi 8. Two CCs to GP for Services 9. Two CCs to GP for Services IV, lO.Three C.D. Copies. Cnr State of Andhra Pradesh, , Srikakulam, Srikakulam Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. , Srikakulam District. Srikurmam, Srikakulam District. Nidhi Bavan, A.P. Advocate [OPUC] I High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] HIGH COURT DATED:21/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.7376 of 2025 03 ^PR® c'‘ rr 09/ nr ^5: DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS