SHYAM NARAYAN TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/114/2025 · 2025-02-07
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122249 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122249 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8082 Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 114 of 2025 Applicant :- Shyam Narayan Tripathi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Govind Kumar Pandey,Anand Kumar,Ashish Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has filed by the applicant with the prayer to direct the concerned court below i.e. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kunda Pratapgarh to decide the Complaint Case No.526 of 2018 (Shyam Narayan Tripathi VS. Ajay Kumar Shukla) under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station- Kunda, District- Pratapgarh pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -Kunda, Pratapgarh within some stipulated period.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the matter under the N.I. Act is pending since 2018 whereas Section 143(3) of N.I. Act itself provides that such a case shall be decided within six months. In view of the aforesaid submission, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kunda Pratapgarh is
directed to consider the case of the applicant, pending before him as expeditiously as possible expeditiously, say, within a period of six months, in accordance with law, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. The concerned Magistrate shall not grant any unnecessary adjournments to either of parties. With the aforesaid direction, the application is
disposed of.
Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Pks Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench