Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 122166 (PNJ)

KHARAIT SINGH AND OTHERS v. AJOY SHARMA AND OTHERS

COCP/4587/2024 · 2025-02-05

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA KHARAIT SINGH AND OTHERS AJOY SHARMA AND OTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel present case have been ordered to be kept in abeyance by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024 passed in LPA No.2032 of 2024 and other connected cases. In view of the above, learned couns does not press the present petition at this stage, however, seek to revive the aforementioned Disposed of Rule stands disch 05.02.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: KHARAIT SINGH AND OTHERS Versus AJOY SHARMA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel informs that the proceedings in the present case have been ordered to be kept in abeyance by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024 passed in LPA No.2032 of 2024 and other connected cases. In view of the above, learned couns does not press the present petition at this stage, however, seek to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned LPA. Disposed of being not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4587-2024 Date of Decision: February 05, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. informs that the proceedings in the present case have been ordered to be kept in abeyance by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024 passed in LPA No.2032 of 2024 and other connected cases. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty present petition, subject to final outcome of the being not pressed with aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 February 05, 2025 informs that the proceedings in the present case have been ordered to be kept in abeyance by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024 passed in LPA s s liberty present petition, subject to final outcome of the TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.19 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document