[2025:RJ-JP:13454] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3984/2025 Mubarik S/o Ali Mohammad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Nangla Bhuriya, P.S. Naugava, District Alwar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvinder Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 25/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.32/2025 registered at Police Station Naugava, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that co-accused Mausam has been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. [2025:RJ-JP:13454] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3984/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that one other case has been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, as also considering the fact that co-accused has been granted benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Mubarik S/o Ali Mohammad, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to 1maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the [2025:RJ-JP:13454] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3984/2025] petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J CHARU SONI /252