ARUN YADAV v. SRI PRABHAKAR TRIPATHI, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (SDM) TEHSIL BINDKI DISTRICT FATEHPUR U.P.
CAPL/364/2025 · 2025-02-12
Manish Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122115 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122115 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9104 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 364 of 2025 Applicant :- Arun Yadav Opposite Party :- Sri Prabhakar Tripathi, Sub Divisional Magistrate (Sdm) Tehsil Bindki District Fatehpur U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Jaiswal,Ashwini Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Learned Standing Counsel has filed instructions dated 11.2.2025 received from Sub Divisional Officer, Bindki, Fatehpur, which is taken on record. Heard. Present contempt petition has been preferred for alleged non compliance of the judgment and order of the Writ Court dated 10.12.2024 passed in Writ A No. 11785 of 2024. The relevant excerpts of the said judgment is being reproduced hereinbelow:-
"In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move fresh representation along with certified copy of this order before respondent No. 5-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Bindki, Fatehpur within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No. 5 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of four weeks thereafter.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 5 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case." Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received from respondent has submitted that in compliance of the
judgment and order dated 10.12.2024, the representation of the applicant has been decided by order dated 07.02.2025. Copy of the said order has already been sent to the applicant and photocopy of the same is being provided to the learned counsel for the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order of the writ court, the
representation preferred by the applicant has been decided and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. As prayed, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 12.2.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench