APHC010143612016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3146 OF 2016 Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 28.04.2016 passed in I.A.No.384 of 2016 in I.A. No.1 of 2016 in O.S. No.799 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional District Judge at Visakhapatnam. Between: Dittakavi Krishna Bharadwaj, S/o.late Nagabhushan Rao, age 27 R/o.7-130/1, Suryanagar, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam District. ...PETITIONER/DEFENDANT NO.1 years. AND 1. Neeli Swathi, W/o.Rambabu, age 29 years, claimed to be R/o. Plot No. 81, 7-130/1, Suryanagar, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam District, but is actually residing elsewhere. ...RESPONDENT N0.1/PLAINTIFF 2. Smt. Vemuri Sumathi, W/o. Narasimha Sharma, age 32 years, R/o. Plot No.101, Opp: TTD Kalyanamandapa, Sector III, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT NO.2/2'^^ DEFENDANT lA NO: 1 OF 2016 (CRPMP 4020 OF 2016): Petition under Section 151 CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order of the IV Additional District Judge at Visakhapatnam in lA No.384 of 2016 in lA No.1 of 2016 in OS No.799 of 2015, dated 28.04.2016 during the pendency of this CRP. I Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.SARVA BHOUMA RAO, ADVOCATE Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI S.ASHOK ANAND KUMAR, ADVOCATE Counsel for Respondent No.2 : -- The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010143612016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3146/2016 Between: D K Bharadwaj, Visakhapatnam Dist AND ...PETITIONER Neeli Swathi ...RESPONDENT(S) Visakhapatnam District and another Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KSARVABHOUMARAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SASHOKANAND KUMAR The Court made the following: Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SDI- K.J.RAJABABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. IV Additional District Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. One CC to Sri K.Sarva Bhouma Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri S.Ashok Anand Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies GPC TAC .. ■ HtGH COURT DATED: 06/08/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 3146 OF 2016 ^ 0 8 SEP 2025 t SectioiiX*^ Co' DISMISSING THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS