Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 122102 (ALL)

C/M, PANDIT DURGA PRASAD BALIKA UCHCHATAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA, AZAMGARH THRU. MANAGER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. OF MADHYAMIK EDUCATION,LKO AND OTHERS

WRIC/1194/2025 · 2025-02-11

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8565 Court No. - 19 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1194 of 2025 Petitioner :- C/M, Pandit Durga Prasad Balika Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Azamgarh Thru. Manager Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Of Madhyamik Education,Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pt. S. Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging Government Order dated 26.12.2022 to the extent it enhances fee structure. A further writ has been sought for a direction to opposite parties to issue recognition for intermediate Section to petitioner-institution as forwarded by District Inspector of Schools on 13.08.2013 ignoring the Government Order dated 26.12.2022. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner on the basis of instructions does not seek to press challenge to Government Order dated 26.12.2022 and is restricting his prayer for a direction to opposite parties to consider the aspect of recognition of Intermediate Section of petitioner-institution. 4. It has been submitted that earlier petitioner-institution had filed WRIT - C No. - 1000007 of 2010 challenging orders dated 03.12.2009 and 19.12.2009 whereby recognition granted to petitioner-institution had been withdrawn. Aforesaid petition was allowed by means of judgment and order dated 07.07.2022 granting liberty to opposite parties to pass fresh orders in accordance with law, if so desired. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that no fresh orders have been passed by competent authority till date due to which petitioner's recognition is continuing. 5. Learned State Counsel on the basis of instruction however submits that Application was required to be preferred by petitioner-institution for recognition in an online mode, which has not been done till date. It is submitted that the process is ongoing in which petitioner can apply online. 6. In view of such submission being made, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner-institution would complete all the necessary formalities required for its recognition. 7. Considering aforesaid submissions raised by learned counsel for the parties, liberty is granted to petitioner-institution to apply for recognition of Intermediate Section to petitioner- institution in an online mode, which shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date online Application is preferred with all completed formalities. 8. With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of.. Order Date :- 11.2.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench