Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12208 (BOM)

ANIL RATILAL VASAIKAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/4278/2025 · 2025-04-01

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Y G Khobragade

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) wp 4278.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4278 OF 2025 ANIL RATILAL VASAIKAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ….. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Suvidh Kulkarni h/f. V.Y. Jaybhaye AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.V. Hange ….. CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 03.04.2025 P.C. :- 1. This is a motion is for speaking to the minutes of order dated 01.04.2025. 2. It is being pointed out that directions were issued to individual Project Officers of the Tribal Department of different locations but erroneously in paragraph nos.1 and 2 of the order the direction has been issued only to respondent no.6 instead of respondent nos.6 to 9. Respondent No.6 be replaced with ‘respondent nos.6 to 9’ at both the places and a corrected order be uploaded. Motion is disposed of. [Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.] [MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] mub 2025:BHC-AUG:9587-DB This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // wp 4278.25.odt (This order dated 01.04.2025 stands corrected in view of the order dated 03.04.2025, on a motion for speaking to the minutes of the order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 51 WRIT PETITION NO. 4278 OF 2025 ANIL RATILAL VASAIKAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .… Mr. Suvidh Kulkarni, h/f Mr. Y. V. Jaybhaye, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. S. V. Hange, AGP for the Respondent – State .… CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 01.04.2025 PER COURT :- . Heard the petitioners who are working in the tribal development department, being managed by the respondent Tribal Integrity Development Project, are seeking benefit of government resolution dated 06.08.2002 and the notification dated 03.02.2023 for grant of pay scale. Their representation dated 20.02.2025 has been pending with respondent Nos.6 to 9. 2. The writ petition is disposed of directing respondent Nos.6 to 9 to consider the proposal on its own merits. [ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] mub This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //