MOHAMMAD SALEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND OTHERS
CRLP/1065/2025 · 2025-02-07
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122078 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 122078 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8052-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1065 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Saleem Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- D.P. Dutt Tiwari,Vivek Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer :-
"I. A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned first information report dated 12.02.2020 lodged as First Information Report No.080 of 2020, under sections- 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 I.P.C. at Police Station- Bachharawan, District- Raebareli, so far its relates to the petitioner, which is contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. II. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite parties not to take any coercive action or to arrest the petitioner in connection with the impugned first information report dated 12.02.2020 lodged as First Information Report No.080 of 2020, under sections- 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 I.P.C. at Police Station- Bachharawan, District- Raebareli, which is contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition, in the interest of justice."
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the first information report and he is
nowhere connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated.
4. Learned A.G.A. has informed this Court that the investigation in the offence was carried out and the name of the petitioner has surfaced during the course of the investigation. The petitioner has absconded and non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner by the learned court concerned.
5. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Forum. (Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.) (Sangeeta Chandra, J.) Order Date :- 7.2.2025 cks/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench