VIVEK PAL ALIAS VIVEK KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
CRLR/724/2024 · 2025-08-12
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12207 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12207 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CRLR No.724 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Ms. Farheen, learned counsel i/b Mr. Bilal Ahmed,
learned counsel for the revisionist.
2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Dy.A.G. with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned B.H. for the State.
3. This matter is lying defective since 07.10.2024. Even though being granted several opportunities, defects have not been removed. Today, learned counsel for the revisionist pleads to have no instructions.
4. The revision is thus, dismissed for non- prosecution.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
12.08.2025 R.Dang