Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:14836
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1418 of 2022 1 - Mandeep Yadav S/o Ramcharan Yadav, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Kamarima, Police Station Pandrapath, Tahsil Sanna, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh), District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bagicha, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bagicha, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Gram Panchayat, Kamarima, Police Station Pandrapath, Tahsil Sanna, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 7 - The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Bagicha, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.02 19:20:56 +0530
2 (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, Advocate For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. Satish Gupta, Government Advocate For Respondents No.6 : Ms. Aakancha Vishwakarma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 27/03/2025
1. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Gupta, learned Government Advocate for the State/respondent/s as well as Ms. Aakancha Vishwakarma, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. A.N. Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent No.6.
2. At the very outset, learned State counsel would submit that since the grievances raised by the petitioner has already been redressed, as such, the petition has became infructuous, to which the learned counsel for the petitioner has not objected.
3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed being infructuous.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi