Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 122054 (ALL)

SAHESH CHANDRA v. THE U.P.JAL NIGAM THROUGH M.D.

WRIA/2250/1998 · 2025-04-07

Brij Raj Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19287 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2250 of 1998 Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra Respondent :- The U.P.Jal Nigam Through M.D. Counsel for Petitioner :- R.R.Awasthi,Akshat Kumar,Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Kapil Deo Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs: "(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the same pay scale and other benefits with effect from the due date to the petitioner, against the post of stenographer, on which post he is working; (b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamum commanding the opposite parties to regularise the services of the petitioner with effect from due date; (c) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamum commanding the opposite parties to treat the petitioner at par with regular employees against his post." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous for the reason that the petitioner has already retired from service. 4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as has become infructuous. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench