Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8185 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1193 of 2025 Applicant :- Lalain @ Moola Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajat Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Shri Ajeet Kumar Singh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant by filing vakalatnama and the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 415 of 2024, under Sections 3(5), 105, 115(2), 352 B.N.S., Police Station- Sandila, District- Hardoi. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant matter due to ulterior motive. He submits that in the FIR, the general role has been assigned to all the accused persons for beating the injured with lathi, who subsequently died. He added that thereafter, the injured assigned the specific role to one co-accused Vineet for beating with lathi and not the applicant. He further added that the matter will not lead to punishment, so far as the role of the present applicant is concerned and further, his role is distinguishable from the role of the co-accused Vineet. He also submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 15.1.2025. He submitted that the applicant undertakes that in case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the complainant has opposed the contentions aforesaid and submits that the present applicant is named in the FIR wherein it has been stated that the applicant including the other co-accused persons had beaten the injured who subsequently died and thus, he is not entitled for any relief. Learned AGA appearing for the State has also supported the version of the counsel for the complainant and submits that the applicant is not entitled for any relief. Having heard learned counsels for the parties and after perusal of material placed on record, it transpires that the applicant is languishing in jail since 15.1.2025; the injured assigned the specific role to one co-accused Vineet for beating with lathi and not the applicant and thus, the matter will not lead to punishment, so far as the role of the present applicant is concerned and further, his role is distinguishable from the role of the co-accused Vineet; there is no previous criminal history of the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant has undertaken that if he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Considering the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and severity of punishment in case of conviction, nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment and considering larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case of bail. Let the applicant- Lalain @ Moola involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (1) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, or otherwise during the investigation or trial; (2) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. He shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code; (3) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.; and (4) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the merits of the case. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench