H.C.P.(MD)No.219 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA H.C.P(MD)No.219 of 2025 Andammal Aadhinamilagi ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Keezhavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.18 of 2025) ... Respondents Prayer: Hebeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to produce the person or body of the detenu namely A.Malliga Wife of Arumugam aged 23 years. For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Sivaram For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.(MD)No.219 of 2025 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.) This Habeas Corpus petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of the detenu namely A.Malliga, wife of Arumugam aged about 23 years 2. The complaint of the petitioner dated 30.01.2025, regarding missing of her daughter namely A.Malliga did not yield any result. Hence the present petition. 3. The respondent police has secured the petitioner's daughter and produced before this Court. She states that she is not happy to be with her husband and her child and therefore, she has deserted them. It appears that the husband of the girl is presently in Dubai and therefore, she took the jewels and gone. On enquiry about that she states that the jewels have been given to known persons and she will return back to her parents. Neither she is willing to live with her parents nor interested to take care of her daughter. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.(MD)No.219 of 2025 4. The respondents police is directed to take necessary action for recovery of the jewels which the petitioner's daughter has taken from the house of the petitioner. 5. In view of the statement given by the petitioner's daughter, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has to work out her remedy before the competent Court, if she is aggrieved. The husband of the petitioner's daughter has to take necessary remedy if he has any grievance over her desertion. 6. Considering the above, this Habeas Corpus petition is not maintainable and stands dismissed. [G.J., J.] [R.P., J.] 21.03.2025 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.(MD)No.219 of 2025 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. and R.POORNIMA, J. rgm To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Keezhavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. H.C.P(MD)No.219 of 2025 21.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis