Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12200 (UTT)

NIKHIL GARG v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2275/2021 · 2025-07-14

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6048 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2275 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Ravi Bisht, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel for petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 and 2. 3. Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.3. 4. Learned counsel for the parties unanimously submitted before this Court that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioners and further, the said charge-sheet was also challenged before this Court by filing C482 application, which too was dismissed. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, nothing remains to be decided in the present criminal writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. 6. Interim order dated 17.12.2021 stands vacated. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 14.07.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f0276c1 6432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D84BDB0 F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.07.14 16:37:48 +05'30'