APHC010143692021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 8273/2021 Between: Potnuru Narayana Rao and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. K MADHAVA REDDY 4. T V S KUMAR The Court made the following The grievance of the petitioner trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land an extent of Ac.0.24 cents in new S.No.475/2B T.S.NO.401/2 situated 80 feet road facin 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 8273/2021 Potnuru Narayana Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): ARAVALA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR) The Court made the following Order: of the petitioners is that respondents Nos.2 to 8 are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land an extent of Ac.0.24 cents in new S.No.475/2B-A (old S.No.475/2B) in T.S.NO.401/2 situated 80 feet road facing towards Eastern side of old IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) is that respondents Nos.2 to 8 are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land, to A (old S.No.475/2B) in g towards Eastern side of old 2 Srikakulam Town as van stand without notice and without following the procedure. 02. Heard Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 03. Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners while reiterating the contents of the affidavit submitted that, the authorities are trying to interfere with the petitioners’ possession highhandedly without following the procedure as contemplated under the law, as such prayed to pass appropriate orders, protecting the interest of the petitioners. 04. On the other hand, Sri Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on counter submitted that, the revenue authorities have admitted the possession of the petitioners and in the year 2021, Sri Mutyalamma transport workers union has formed a Transport Stand in the said land without permission of the petitioners, thereafter as per the orders of the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, they vacated the Transport Stand in the said land and the said land is under the possession of the petitioners and not being used for any parking purpose and accordingly, prayed to close the writ petition. 05. Perused the material available on record and considered the submissions of both the learned counsel. 06. The petitioners apprehending dispossession by the respondents without following due process contemplated under the law, filed the present writ petition. In the counter it was categorically stated that the petitioners are in possession of the property and the van stand was removed thereupon. In view of the same, there remains nothing for adjudication and the writ petition is liable to be closed. 3 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 09th January, 2025 KKV 4 212 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO.8273 OF 2021 Dated:09-01-2025 KKV 5 6 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Writ Petition No. 8273 OF 2021 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 03. 9.01.2025 RC, J The Writ Petition is closed. (Vide Separate Order) ________ RC, J KKV 7 RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J