SMT. SUSHILA DEVI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/1197/2025 · 2025-02-07
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121944 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121944 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8192-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1197 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Sushila Devi And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard Shri Mukesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Akansha Dubey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners claim to have a partition decree in their favour passed under Section 176 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 which is dated
05.12.2012.
3. The petitioners have a remedy under Para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual subject to point of limitation. They can avail the same.
4. At this stage, Ms. Akansha Dubey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State says that as per written instructions received from the S.D.M., Mohanlalganj, Lucknow demarcation of boundaries as per the partition decree was done on 18.03.2024. She says it appears that the petitioners have been dispossessed again.
5. If it is so, then, it is open for the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy in this regard.
6. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 7.2.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench